Cases 1 - 10 of 16
AUTRY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv01501
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY AUTRY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRISON COMMISSIONER BLANCHE CARNEY, WARDEN PIERRE LACOMBE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rapp et al v. NaphCare Inc et al
as 3:2021cv05800
Plaintiff:
John Rapp, Megan F Wabnitz and Judith Rapp
Defendant:
NaphCare Inc, Kitsap County, Gary Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frances Ju v. Maurice Lacombe, et al
as 19-36028
Defendant / Appellee:
AIRBNB INC., STATE OF WASHINGTON and MAURICE LACOMBE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCES DU JU
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00712
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv01127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ju v. Lacombe et al
as 3:2018cv05309
Plaintiff:
Frances Du Ju
Defendant:
Maurice Lacombe, Airbnb Inc, State of Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shane Gates v. Rodney Strain, et al
as 17-30519
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHANE M. GATES
Defendant - Appellee:
RODNEY JACK STRAIN, Sheriff, in his official and individual capacity, WALTER P. REED, District Attorney, in his official capacity, CHARLES M. HUGHES, JR., Attorney and others
Caraway v. City of Elizabeth City, North Carolina et al
as 2:2017cv00020
Defendant:
City of Elizabeth City, North Carolina, Jamie Lacombe and Cathy Hewitt
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Caraway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LaCombe v. JOHN KNOX VILLAGE OF FLORIDA, INC
as 0:2014cv61048
Plaintiff:
Onnalee LaCombe
Defendant:
JOHN KNOX VILLAGE OF FLORIDA, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0623
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
