Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Phillips v. Rose et al
as 2:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lee Phillips
Defendant:
Timothy Rose, Lorenzo Emilio and 10th Judicial District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Phillips et al v. County Of Smith et al
as 4:2023cv01928
Plaintiff:
Derek-Lee Phillips and Cody-Storm Voss
Defendant:
County Of Smith, Johnathan Peters, Riley Rugg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Biden (TV2)
as 2:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Cory Lee Phillips
Defendant:
Joseph Robinette Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. State of New Mexico, County of Dona Ana
as 2:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lee Phillips
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, County of Dona Ana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Las Cruces Sun News
as 2:2022cv00357
Defendant:
Matthew Lee Phillips and Las Cruces Sun News
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. Coldren
as 1:2022cv00134
Defendant:
John Coldren and John Colden Lawler
Plaintiff:
James Lee Phillips and James L Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Phillips - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. Coldren
as 1:2022cv00135
Defendant:
John Coldren and John Coldren Lawler
Plaintiff:
James Lee Phillips and James L Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
State of Michigan v. Phillips
as 1:2020cv00849
Plaintiff:
State of Michigan
Defendant:
Terry Lee Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Phillips v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2020cv00675
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Phillips
Defendant:
La'Quandra L. Smith and Michael P. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
