Cases 1 - 10 of 401
Lin v. Wray
as 24-10420
Plaintiff:
Ke-Wei Lin
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, United States Department of Justice, (CA), Chad Yarbrough and others
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lin v. Wray et al
as 3:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Ke-Wei Lin
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, DOJ, Chad Yarbrough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mattera v. Xian E
as 1:2024cv01970
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mattera
Defendant:
Lin Xian E
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Elmurodov v. University of Maryland Capital Region Health et al
as 8:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Otabek Elmurodov
Defendant:
University of Maryland Capital Region Health Family, Donna Prill, Alexander Kaysin and others
Petitioner:
Christopher McLeod and Bai Lin Luo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
