Cases 1 - 10 of 551
LANS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2024cv06172
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MICHAEL LANS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY, BARBARA C. STOLTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Brown v. Flyman et al
as 3:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Marlon Lorenzo Brown
Defendant:
Michael Flyman, Easy bail LLC and American Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Gage v. City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Gage
Defendant:
City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge and Matthew Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARRISON v. AUSTIN
as 1:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
LORENZO HARRISON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Phillips v. Rose et al
as 2:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lee Phillips
Defendant:
Timothy Rose, Lorenzo Emilio and 10th Judicial District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Meyer v. Sparks et al
as 3:2024cv05211
Plaintiff:
S Marie Meyer
Defendant:
Lorenzo Sparks and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
