Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Price v. State of Kansas, et al
as 16-3277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID MARTIN PRICE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, KANSAS DIVISION OF CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES, SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS and others
HERZ v. BAYH et al
as 1:2015cv00434
Defendant:
U.S. SEN. EVAN BAYH, GERALD BEPKO, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF HAMILTON COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
State of Kansas v. Price
as 13-3237
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID MARTIN PRICE
Kansas, State of v. Price
as 5:2013cv04080
Plaintiff:
Kansas, State of
Defendant:
David Martin Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
SRIVASTAVA v. HAMILTON et al
as 1:2013cv00134
Defendant:
AARON-RUBEN-NELSON MORTUARY, MARY MORIARTY ADAMS, AFNI, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN H. SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Pearson v. Quattlebaum et al (Dale County CA # CV-2011-89)
as 1:2012cv00016
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Pearson
Defendant:
Kenneth Quattlebaum, Robert H. Brogden, Brogden Law Firm LLC and others
Movant:
Clarissa Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Landrith et al
as 4:2011cv00422
Plaintiff:
Janice L King
Defendant:
Bret D Landrith, Donna Huffman, Samuel Lapari and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Huffman et al
as 5:2011cv04001
Plaintiff:
Janice Lynn King
Defendant:
Donna Huffman, Bret D. Landrith, Samuel La Pari and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Huffman et al
as 5:2010cv04152
Plaintiff:
Janice Lynn King
Defendant:
Donna Huffman, Bret D. Landrith, Samuel La Pari and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Kansas v. Price, et al
as 07-3024
Petitioner - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, ex rel Phil Kline, Attorney General
Respondent - Appellant:
DAVID MARTIN PRICE, ROSEMARY DENISE PRICE and JANICE LYNN KING
Respondent:
PRO SE ADVOCATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
