Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Reed v. Ranlife Home Loans et al
as 2:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Michelle Reed
Defendant:
Ranlife Home Loans and Ranlife
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burkard v. Dreaney et al
as 1:2019cv07689
Defendant:
Scott M. Lekan, Timothy C. Idoni, M. Dreaney and others
Plaintiff:
Brian L. Burkard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932 bv
Whitaker v. The Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia et al
as 1:2018cv00141
Defendant:
James Rush, Michelle Reed, Donna Wear and others
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Reed v. Arapahoe County Sheriff's Office, The et al
as 1:2010cv01295
Plaintiff:
Jolene Michelle Reed
Defendant:
Arapahoe County Sheriff's Office, The, Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe County, Colorado, Centura Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRISON v. GAMBLE et al
as 2:2009cv06112
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL A. HARRISON, JR.
Defendant:
RICHARD GAMBLE, MICHELLE REED, RUTH COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Raheem Muhammad v. Rosemary Williamson-Crawl
as 09-1091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAHEEM MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
ROSEMARY WILLIAMSON-CRAWL, ANGELA BONSU, MICHELLE REED and others
Muhammad v. Williamson-Crawl et al
as 8:2008cv02971
Plaintiff:
Raheem Muhammad
Defendant:
Rosemary Williamson-Crawl, Angela Bonsu, Michelle Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
