Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Ishak v. Greensburg Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Akuwa Ishak
Defendant:
Michael Martin, Hammond Police Department, Edwin Bergeron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ISHAK v. GREENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv03151
Plaintiff:
AKUA ISHAK
Defendant:
GREENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, LEE CARMONA, CEDRIC BURRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tidriri v. The Board of Regents et al
as 4:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Moulay Tidriri
Defendant:
The Board of Regents, Iowa State University, Mary Vermeer Andringa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Martin v. Department of Child Services et al
as 1:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Scott Michael Martin
Defendant:
Department of Child Services, Erica Bashara and Jasmine Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. YES Automotive et al
as 1:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Scott Michael Martin
Defendant:
YES Automotive and Brian Brothers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Martin v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
State of Texas and Nick Reyna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55625
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davis v. PC Investment Properties LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Deborah L. Davis
Defendant:
PC Investment Properties LLC, Liberty Holdings Management LLC, Poovindran Pillay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Martin v. State of Utah, et al
as 23-4045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
C. MICHAEL MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH, BRITTEN LUND, KIM DIMOND-SMITH and others
William Martin, et al v. Mauricio Duran, et al
as 23-10841
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILLIAM MARTIN and MICHAEL MARTIN
Defendant / Appellant:
MAURICIO DURAN and BRIDGET DOYLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
