Cases 1 - 10 of 1,631
Washington v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Ebony Washington
Defendant:
Sheriff Gordon Smith, Jared Mallard, Bill Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Williams v. Dart Transit Company [US DOT#75525] et al
as 2:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Gerrick Darell Williams
Defendant:
Dart Transit Company [US DOT#75525], Fleetline doing business as Dart Transit Company, Quantrez Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00366
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Brooks v. Murray City Police Department
as 2:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Janay Brooks
Defendant:
Murray City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MURRAY-BEY v. JONES et al
as 3:2024cv05738
Plaintiff:
DANNY-R: MURRAY-BEY
Defendant:
RODERICK JONES and NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murray et al v. Leblanc et al
as 3:2024mc00070
Plaintiff:
James Murray
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc
Petitioner:
Correct Commissary, LLC
Murray et al v. Leblanc et al
as 2:2024mc01065
Plaintiff:
Correct Commissary, LLC
Defendant:
James Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0034 Other Civil Rights
Stephen Murray v. Governor, State of Florida, et al
as 24-10583
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LYNCH MURRAY
Defendant:
GOVERNOR, STATE OF FLORIDA and CHIEF JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
