Cases 1 - 10 of 4,782
Li v. Su et al
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Bing Hong Li
Defendant:
Ming Ming Su, Patrick Li, US Department of States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lambert v. US Dept of Veterans Affairs
as 9:2024cv80619
Plaintiff:
Donna Lambert
Defendant:
US Dept of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Flemons (PS) v. US Military
as 1:2024cv01321
Plaintiff:
Joanna Flemons
Defendant:
US Military
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aboussa et al v. NH State Police et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Ekoue Dodji Aboussa and Images Des Reves Photography
Defendant:
NH State Police, US Federal Bureau of Investigation and Concord Police
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Williams v. Dart Transit Company [US DOT#75525] et al
as 2:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Gerrick Darell Williams
Defendant:
Dart Transit Company [US DOT#75525], Fleetline doing business as Dart Transit Company, Quantrez Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
