Cases 1 - 10 of 11
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2022cv00817
Plaintiff:
Deanna Lopez
Defendant:
Megan Day Hill, Lawrence Hill and Persons Unknown
Not Classified By Court:
Patricia Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01207
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv14466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Charles Cephas v. Maryland Rural Development Cor
as 11-1079
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES T. CEPHAS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARYLAND RURAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS, CHERYL VICTORIA BEARD, Individually, ELAINE PATRICIA HILL, Individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv02888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cephas v. Maryland Rural Development Corp. Board of Directors et al
as 1:2010cv00813
Plaintiff:
Charles T. Cephas
Defendant:
Maryland Rural Development Corp. Board of Directors, Cheryl Victoria Beard, Elaine Patricia Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Brian Lewis, et al v. Pitcher, et al
as 09-30131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN LEWIS and GINA SWIFT
Defendant - Appellee:
RACHEL P MORGAN, Commissioner, JANICE CLARK, KAY BATES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
