Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Holmes v. White
as 24-30194
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Holmes
Defendant:
Robert Michael White, individually and in his official capacity as Assistant District Attorney, Charles J. Ballay, individually and in his official capacity as District Attorney, Daniel R. Martiny and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Reddoch
as 23-30424
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Michael R. Holmes
Defendant / Appellant:
Corbett Reddoch and Gerald A. Turlich, Jr., in his official capacity as sheriff of Plaquemines Parish
Holmes v. White et al
as 2:2023cv01247
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Holmes
Defendant:
Robert M. White and Charles J. Ballay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Reddoch et al
as 2:2019cv12749
Defendant:
Gerald A. Turlich, Jr., H. Hardin, C. Lambert and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lyttle v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv01754
Shield #5104)(Tax ID#941909:
NYPD Officer Andrew R. Holmes
Plaintiff:
Trevor Lyttle
Defendant:
NYPD Officers John & Jane Does 1 and 2 and The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
