Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Shelby v. Lynn et al
as 3:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Jeffry K. Shelby
Defendant:
Jonathan Lynn, Robert Andy Jones, Shane Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Singh v. Amar et al
as 2:2022cv02252
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Keerut Singh and Keith Singh
Defendant:
Vikram D Amar, Virginia M Vermillion, Verity Winship and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Clervrain v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Eric Holcomb, Suzanne Crouch, Holli Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lane v. Cole et al
as 6:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Gregory R. Lane
Defendant:
Eddie Cole, Ofc. Robert L. Jones, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeffery Wooden v. The Town of Eatonville, et al
as 22-10649
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY WOODEN
Defendant / Appellee:
THE TOWN OF EATONVILLE, ROY SMITH, Individually, ROBERT L. JONES, Individually and others
Jones v. Goodwin et al
as 4:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Jones, II
Defendant:
Taylor Goodwin, Richard Townsend, Aaron Waibel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
