Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Roloff v. Cichocki et al
as 1:2019cv10411
Plaintiff:
Michelle Roloff
Defendant:
Dolly Hwang and Timothy Cichocki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLETT v. POMPEO et al
as 1:2018cv01707
Defendant:
PATRICK P O'CARROLL, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, JOHN D WILCOCK and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY WILLETT and JEFFREY M. WILLETT
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez et al v. Board of Education of Niles Township High School District 219 et al
as 1:2015cv10015
Plaintiff:
Fernando Perez and Nanciann Gatta
Defendant:
Board of Education of Niles Township High School, District 219 , Mark Sproat , David Ko and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROLOFF v. CHRISTIE
as 3:2015cv01432
Plaintiff:
DEBORA L. ROLOFF
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CHRISTIE, GLENN GRANT, STEPHEN M. SWEENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2015cv00016
Defendant:
City of Omaha, City of Omaha Planning Dept. and Roloff Construction
Plaintiff:
Willie E. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bounds et al v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2013cv00266
Plaintiff:
Michael Bounds , Forest Olivier , Wia Day and others
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Minnesota State Patrol, Riccardo Munoz and others
Amy Roloff, et al v. Washington County, et al
as 12-35616
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMY J. ROLOFF and MATTHEW J. ROLOFF
Defendant - Appellee:
WASHINGTON COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, JOHN WHEELER, JAY WINCHESTER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Roloff et al v. Washington County et al
as 3:2010cv01487
Plaintiff:
Amy J. Roloff and Matthew J. Roloff
Defendant:
Washington County, John Wheeler and Jay Winchester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
