Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Muhammad v. Imam of the Salafi Sect in Pittsburgh, PA et al
as 3:2021cv00590
Defendant:
Richerson Moosa Abbas Abu Imam, Minister Louis Farrakhan and Imam of the Salafi Sect in Pittsburgh, PA
Plaintiff:
Walid A Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Watson v. All Federal Departments, et al
as 4:2018cv02049
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Watson
Defendant:
Federal Department, Richerson Apartments, Internal Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRICE EL v. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2011cv02213
Plaintiff:
LLOYD N. PRICE EL
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, MAX A. BAKER, JAMES L. JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Konota Gaskins, et al v. Rick Santorum, et al
as 08-4522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KONOTA GASKINS
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE and MIKE HEPLER
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK SANTORUM, RANDY VULAKOVICH, EUGENE BEARD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008mi00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
