Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Willis v. Nashville Machine Elevator Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv02810
Plaintiff:
Robert Willis
Defendant:
Nashville Machine Elevator Company, Inc. and International Union of Elevator Constructors Local No. 93
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Chapdelaine v. Eastford
as 16-3109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darlene Anne Chapdelaine
Defendant - Appellee:
Town of Eastford, its officials, Inland Wetlands Watercourse Commission, Town of Eastford, Thomas DeJohn and others
Defendant:
Gary Warren, Deborah Torcellini, Paul Torcellini and others
Chapdelaine v. Eastford et al
as 3:2015cv01222
Plaintiff:
Darlene Anne Chapdelaine
Defendant:
Town of Eastford , Inland Wetlands Watercourse Commission , Thomas DeJohn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Chapdelaine v. Duncan et al
as 3:2014cv01581
Plaintiff:
Darlene Anne Chapdelaine
Defendant:
Mary Duncan, John Revill, Town of Eastford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv50318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Heard v. Wells Fargo Banks et al
as 2:2014cv00212
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Banks, Quicken Loans, Anhphuc D. Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv10127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
