Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02067
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Liviz v. Supreme Court of the United State of America, et al
as 1:2018cv12620
Defendant:
Michigan Supreme Court, Louisiana Supreme Court, Kansas Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Jurist ilya Liviz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01882
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12201 Americans With Disabilities Act-Injured Worker Discrimination
Eugene Forte v. Merced County, et al
as 16-17236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE FORTE
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCED COUNTY, ERIC A. DUMARS, MERCED COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and others
Williamson v. Entrekin et al
as 4:2016cv00688
Plaintiff:
Miguel Williamson
Defendant:
Todd Entrekin, Scott Hassell, Ragless and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomason v. Moeller et al
as 4:2016cv00141
Plaintiff:
Marilynn Thomason
Defendant:
Gregory W Moeller, Darren B Simpson, Jim Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bridgewater Products, Inc. v. Penske et al
as 0:2014cv61060
Plaintiff:
Bridgewater Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Roger S. Penske, Detroit Diesel, Penske Truck Leasing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fischer et al v. NYS Board of Elections et al
as 2:2012cv05397
Petitioner:
Gregory John Fischer, Bill Jurow and Roger S. Lewis
Respondent:
NYS Board of Elections, Nassau County Board of Elections and Suffolk County Board of Elections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
