Cases 1 - 10 of 2,972
John Marchisotto v. Juan Sanchez, et al
as 24-1922
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Watkins v. Chau, et al
as 1:2024cv11328
Plaintiff:
Ida Watkins
Defendant:
Stephanie Chau, Christopher Norris, Kevin Collins and others
Tolliver (PS) v. Sanchez
as 1:2024cv01409
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver
Defendant:
Marcelis Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FREEMAN et al v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY FREEMAN and C. B.
Defendant:
MARBELY SANCHEZ, GREGORY J. SEABOLT and CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolliver (PS) v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv01347
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver
Defendant:
Maliek Bailey, Jelani Bailey, Ateba Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Robert Sanchez v. Auto Emporium et al
as 8:2024cv00987
Petitioner:
ROBERT SANCHEZ, AUTO EMPORIUM, a business entity, JOE LEZMA, an individual and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Robert Sanchez v. Auto Emporium et al
as 8:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SANCHEZ
Defendant:
AUTO EMPORIUM, a business entity, JOE LEZMA and MF REAL ESTATE LLC, a California limited liability company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
D. Diaz v. Paul Camacho et al
as 2:2024cv03737
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
PAUL CAMACHO, N. CALVILLO, G. PRECIADO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lucius et al v Naphcare Inc.
as 1:2024cv01242
Plaintiff:
Estate of Alizon Lopez and SHAWN LUCIUS
Defendant:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONES OF COUNTY OF MESA, COLORADO, Todd Rowell, Craig Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 198
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
