Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Andrews v. Securus Technologies, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Amanda A Andrews and Amanda A. Andrews
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, LLC, Wyandot County Sheriff's Department, Wyandot County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv05746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00846
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ohanian v. Douglas County Sheriffs Office et al
as 1:2018cv01376
Plaintiff:
Adrian Cal Ohanian and Zackari Parrish
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriffs Office, Denver County Jail, Denver Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lewis v. Country of Russia et al
as 4:2018cv00124
Plaintiff:
James D Lewis
Defendant:
Country of Russia and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Austin Lawyers Guild et al. v. Securus Technologies, Inc. et al.
as 1:2014cv00366
Plaintiff:
Austin Lawyers Guild, Carl Gossett, David Grassbaugh and others
Defendant:
County Attorney David Escamilla, Sheriff Greg Hamilton, District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510 Wire and Electronic Communications Interception
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
