Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Dr. Dre et al
as 2:2024cv00549
Defendant:
Neverland Rach, Wang Film Productions, Dr. Dre and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Feds for Medical Freedom et al v. Garland et al
as 4:2023cv01817
Plaintiff:
Feds for Medical Freedom, adam arce, jose villela and others
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, US Dept of Justice, Christopher Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Daigle v. Mathew et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Claudia Daigle
Defendant:
Francis J. Mathew, Julie J Vargas, John P Hays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv14343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Shakespeare et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv05305
Defendant:
City of New York, Christopher Scaperotta, Nelson Ayala and others
Plaintiff:
Jahmar Minott, Stanley Pitton, Kawayne Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00733
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00650
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-35778
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
