Civil Rights Cases
Reynolds v. City of Lafayette, Indiana et al
as 4:2021cv00039
Defendant: CITY OF LAFAYETTE, INDIANA, CARSON SMITH and Lafayette, Indiana City of
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY REYNOLDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis et al v. Southwestern Correctional, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00146
Defendant: Southwestern Correctional, LLC d/b/a LASALLE CORRECTIONS, LLC and LASALLE SOUTHWEST CORRECTIONS, Steven Foltz, A Hughes and others
Plaintiff: Michael Glenn Austin and Mary Margaret Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00052
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01441
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv01441
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Celestine Washington, et al v. Willingboro Pol Dept, et al
as 10-4151
Plaintiff - Appellant: CELESTINE WASHINGTON, Administratrix and Prosequendum o.b.o. the Est. of Tyrone Awkward and in her own right and THE ESTATE OF TYRONE AWKWARD
Defendant - Appellee: WILLINGBORO POL DEPT, WILLINGBORO TWP, JAMES PARTON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00004
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
WASHINGTON et al v. WILLINGBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv05083
Plaintiff: CELESTINE WASHINGTON and THE ESTATE OF TYRONE AWKWARD
Defendant: WILLINGBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, TOWNSHIP OF WILLINGBORO, JAMES PARTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?