Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Pina v. Brinker International
as 0:2023cv60477
Plaintiff:
Traci Lee Pina
Defendant:
Brinker International doing business as Chili's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Christopher Stewart v. Law Fu, et al
as 22-16799
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER STEWART
Defendant / Appellee:
LAW FU, Dr., MELBA STARR, Associate Warden, SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Defendant:
ROBERT BURTON, Warden and KEN DIXON
Clervrain et al v. Fortenberry et al
as 7:2022cv05003
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Wesner Compere
Defendant:
Jeff Fortenberry, Don Bacon, Adrian Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2021cv00158
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Thomas J. Wheeler, John A. Buldue and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lee Holmes, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Skaar et al
as 3:2020cv05100
Plaintiff:
Alice Hicks
Defendant:
Thomas Clifford Skaar, Princeton Property Management and Tracy Lee Skaar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv01530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WAITING FOR WALK-IN PAYMENT & WILL FILE CCS (PC) Stewart v. Fu et al
as 2:2019at00125
Defendant:
Sacramento Sheriff Department, Dr. Fu, Sacramento Office of County Counsel and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Andrew Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Perry, et al.
as 5:2018ct03152
Plaintiff:
Alice Thomason Roberts
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, Erik A. Hooks, W. David Guice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Perry, et al.
as 5:2018cv00288
Plaintiff:
Alice Thomason Roberts
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, Erik A. Hooks, W. David Guice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-14091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
