Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-12681
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01914
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HYBRID PHARMA LLC v. Knispel et al
as 0:2022cv61136
Plaintiff:
HYBRID PHARMA LLC
Defendant:
Matthew Knispel, Mark Whitten and Robert Difiore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Abryel Wilder, et al v. Jay Inslee, et al
as 21-35439
Plaintiff:
PARENT OF Y.C.M.W., PROPERTY OF 32328 7TH AVENUE SW, OWNER OF BURIAL SITE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY ROBERT INSLEE, TIANNI SHANE HARRISON, et al. and DANIEL SATTERBERG
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABRYEL MICHOLE-MEENA WILDER
Wilder et al v. Inslee et al
as 2:2021cv00465
Plaintiff:
Parent of Y.C.M.W., Property of 32328 7th Avenue SW, Owners of Yah's Knights and Dames and others
Defendant:
Tianni Shane Harrison, Daniel Satterberg and Jay Robert Inslee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ducharme v. Hybrid Drilling, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01906
Defendant:
Hybrid Drilling, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Donald Ducharme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv05107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
