Cases 91 - 100 of 107
Mario Anthony Allen v. Indiana State Attorney General
as 3:2008cv00124
Plaintiff:
Mario Anthony Allen
Defendant:
Indiana State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2008cv00295
Plaintiff:
MARIO ANTHONY ALLEN
Defendant:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Allen v. Indiana Attorney General of
as 3:2008cv00098
Plaintiff:
Mario Anthony Allen
Defendant:
Indiana Attorney General of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. BUSS et al
as 3:2008cv00036
Petitioner:
Mario Anthony Allen
Respondent:
Edwin Buss and Indiana State of Attorney General of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALLEN v. BUSS et al
as 1:2008cv00053
Petitioner:
MARIO ANTHONY ALLEN
Respondent:
EDWIN BUSS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Superintendent of Indiana State Prison
as 3:2008cv00026
Petitioner:
Mario Anthony Allen
Respondent:
Superintendent of Indiana State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Sisto et al
as 2:2007cv02781
Petitioner:
Anthony Allen
Respondent:
D. K. Sisto and Attorney General CA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Reescano et al
as 9:2007cv00310
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Allen, Sr
Defendant:
F Reescano, Warren G Oliver, David Sweeten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Donnell et al v. Ludeman et al
as 0:2007cv04887
Plaintiff:
Mike J. O'Donnell, Brian Clark Staley, Isaiah Charles Swedeen and others
Defendant:
Cal Ludeman, Joan Fabian, John "Jack" Erskine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Feinerman et al
as 3:2007cv00805
Plaintiff:
Anthony Allen
Defendant:
Adrian Feinerman
Cause Of Action: O
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
