Cases 91 - 100 of 107
Ecby v. John Allen and Associates et al
as 3:2011cv00406
Plaintiff:
Leroy Ecby
Defendant:
John Allen and Associates, Antoinette Taylor, LVN Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Tucker et al
as 2:2011cv00339
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. Watson
Defendant:
J. Tucker, W. Campbell, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Thaler et al
as 4:2010cv01134
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lonnie Baker
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Bill Pierce, Akbar Shabazz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Konkel et al v. McMurray et al
as 5:2009cv06145
Petitioner:
Wieslawa Irena Konkel, Lovlin Grewal and Antoinette Grewal
Respondent:
William McMurray, Chad Gaddie, Jere L. Loyd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. United States Of America
as 4:2009cv00190
Petitioner:
Tara Antoinette Johnson
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
REED et al v. BATTLE et al
as 1:2009cv02051
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Defendant:
ALEXIS BATTLE, ANTOINETTE BATTLE and SCOTT DOWLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. The United States of America
as 4:2009cv00087
Petitioner:
Tara Antoinette Johnson
Respondent:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bradley v. Javois et al
as 4:2009cv00518
Plaintiff:
Gregory David Bradley
Defendant:
Laurent D. Javois, Phillip Clayes, Antoinette Ray and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin v. Irving et al
as 2:2008cv00497
Plaintiff:
Derrick Allen Martin
Defendant:
Antoinette Irving and Captain Garrison
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Miller v. Bartram et al
as 3:2009cv05094
Plaintiff:
Sky-Steven Thomas Miller
Defendant:
Perry Bartram, Karen Forbes, Ron Van Boening and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
