Cases 91 - 100 of 133
Tilford v. Chau et al
as 3:2012cv02507
Plaintiff:
Orlando Leroy Tilford
Defendant:
J. Chau, M.D. and R. Walker, D.O.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florence v. Louisville Metro Corrections Department et al
as 3:2012cv00594
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Florence
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Corrections Department and R. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benson v. Morrow et al
as 2:2012cv02766
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
J. Morrow, D. Sanders, Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solis v. Paramo et al
as 3:2012cv01888
Plaintiff:
Salvador Solis
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, J. Clark Kelso, K. Seely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Morrow et al
as 2:2012cv02638
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
J. Morrow, D. Sanders, Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Walker v. Donald Pom Pan, et al
as 12-15961
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD R. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD POM PAN, M.D. (Orthopedic Surgeon), TIMOTHY FREIDERICHS, M.D. (Staff Physician & Surgeon), J. WALKER, M.D. (Chief Health Care) and others
Moore v. Ashbel et al
as 1:2011cv00599
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L. Moore
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, II, Robert M. McCutcheon, Kenneth R. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Wall et al
as 1:2011cv00483
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L. Moore
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, II, Robert M. McCutcheon, Kenneth R. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harold Henderson v. Correctional Medical Services, et al
as 11-2699
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Harold Henderson
Defendant - Appellee:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Arkansas Department of Correction, M. Zoldessy, Dr., CMS Dental Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Perkins v. Washington et al
as 1:2011cv02590
Plaintiff:
Sherwin S. Perkins
Defendant:
Leila Washington and Robin R. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
