Cases 101 - 110 of 1,323
Heath v. French Robertson Unit
as 1:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
French Robertson Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. French Robertson Unit
as 4:2023cv01159
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
French Robertson Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grayer v. Martin et al
as 2:2023cv01133
Plaintiff:
Albert Anthony Grayer
Defendant:
Heath Martin, T. Lane, Michael Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Lasing
as 4:2023cv01116
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Mike Lasing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HART v. HOLLAND et al
as 5:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN HARTMAN and BENJAMIN ESTABON CARLITO HART
Defendant:
HEATH HOLLAND, JOSEPH FLOYD, B SHOUPPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Branham et al
as 7:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Heath Anthony Baker, Ashley, Anthony Heath Baker and others
Defendant:
Christy Branham, Kentucky Parole Board, Cookie Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Harrison County, Mississippi
as 1:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Brian Heath Gomez
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Timothy Jackson v. Connie Mitchell, et al
as 23-1487
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Wade Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
Connie Mitchell, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, James Ross, Probation Officer, James Heath, Probation/Parole Officer and others
Clyne v. Lee, et al.
as 3:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Heath Thomas Clyne
Defendant:
Ben Lee, Seth Radiner, Jeremy Wallingford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Parole
as 4:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Seciol Heath and Secial Heath
Defendant:
Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
