Cases 101 - 110 of 161
Frederick Banks v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 12-2168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks, An American Indian
Defendant - Appellee:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Banks v. Clinton et al
as 4:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel LaMarch v. American Mortgage, LLC, et al
as 12-5165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL D. LAMARCH
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN MORTGAGE, LLC, CASLIN MORTGAGE, LLC, BART D. SCHULTZ, Owner, Caslin Mortgage, LLC and others
LaMarch v. American Mortgage, LLC et al
as 5:2012cv00033
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. LaMarch
Defendant:
American Mortgage, LLC, Caslin Mortgage, LLC, Bart D. Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amua v. California Departments of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2012cv00146
Plaintiff:
Imani Preacherman Amua
Defendant:
Bank of America, California Departments of San Bernardino, Chief of Police and others
Paul Chergi v. Verizon Communications, Inc., et al
as 12-10422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL CHERGI
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., PRESIDENT USA, BANK OF AMERICA and others
Buford v. Bank of America et al
as 1:2011cv09032
Plaintiff:
Michael A Buford
Defendant:
Bank of America, Saue and Mgn Deloris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHERGI v. Verizon Communications Inc et al
as 7:2011cv00166
Plaintiff:
PAUL EUGENE CHERGI
Defendant:
Verizon Communications Inc, Barack Hussein Obama, Bank of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-4111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael L Overton v. Twentieth Century Investors et al
as 2:2011cv08466
Defendant:
Bank of America - CEO, John Kerscthe, James Stowers and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Overton
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
