Cases 101 - 110 of 4,652
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01084
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SANCHEZ BUSTAMANTE v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv04180
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ENRIQUE SANCHEZ BUSTAMANTE
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garcia Sanchez v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Oscar Santiago Garcia Sanchez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sanchez v. Church
as 7:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Randy Sanchez, Jr.
Defendant:
Mrs. Church
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Sanchez
as 24-40181
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Jerry Sanchez, Warden, Isaac Kwarteng, Medical Director, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Turoczi et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Jason Turoczi, Chad Weed, Richard Brown and others
Defendant:
Scott Sempel, Edward Maldonado, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valencia v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Francisco Shanchez Valencia and Francisco Sanchez Valencia
Defendant:
Unknown Warden
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomas v. Linthicum
as 24-40165
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Lanette Linthicum, Isaac Kwarteng, Jerry Sanchez and others
Diez v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
James Logan Diez
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Warden Jerry Sanchez, Elbert Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Verlander v. Aransas County Sheriffs Dept et al
as 2:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Adam Wayne Verlander
Defendant:
Aransas County Sheriffs Dept, Sheriff William Mills, Armando Chapa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
