Cases 111 - 120 of 918
Henard v. Shradder
as 1:2021cv03123
Petitioner:
Bobby E. Henard
Respondent:
Jeff Shradder
Defendant:
Well Path Medical Services, Monica L. Alberts, Jamie Xiong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GLENN v. LOCKETTE et al
as 1:2021cv00196
Plaintiff:
VERNON MELVIN GLENN, JR
Defendant:
JUDGE WILLIE LOCKETTE, JUSTIN MANN, JERAL JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv04611
Plaintiff:
PAUL D. MANN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tuten v. Nocco, et al
as 8:2021cv02397
Plaintiff:
Terry Burdette Tuten
Defendant:
Chris Nocco, Home Wav L.L.C, Officer J. Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. Clark et al
as 4:2021cv04158
Petitioner:
Daniel Ray Mann
Respondent:
Doug Clark and Attorney General of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Windham et al
as 3:2021cv00613
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Unknown Windham, Sgt. Unknown Tyler, Corr. Officer Unknown Mann and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. Friday, et al.
as 1:2021cv02449
Plaintiff:
Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr.
Defendant:
MRDCC, Warden Cleveland Friday, Warden Nurudeen Matti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hill v. Carter et al
as 3:2021cv00716
Plaintiff:
Shawn M Hill
Defendant:
Robert E Carter, William Hyatt, Payne and others
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. Gillece-Black
as 4:2021cv01781
Petitioner:
Louis R. Mann
Respondent:
Warden Jennifer Gillece-Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crumbly v. Public Defender Office et al
as 2:2021cv00649
Plaintiff:
Nealey Mann Crumbly, Jr.
Defendant:
Public Defender Office, State Attorney Office, Attorney General of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
