Cases 111 - 120 of 2,643
Smith v. Walstead et al
as 6:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Zechariah Justin Daniel Smith
Defendant:
Carrie Walstead and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Klang et al
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Fred Lee Davenport
Defendant:
Rodney Klang, Rebecca Tervonen, Sgt Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOVEL v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
TAMALA KATHLEEN DOVEL
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, WARDEN PAUL SMEAL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS JOHN/JANE DOE#'S 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Krzywkowski v. Mohr et al
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Grady Krzywkowski
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Mike Davis, Warden Keith Foley and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOK v. Tustin
as 2:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
SADIE L COOK
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER F. TUSTIN and JOHN/JANES DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dyson v. Lane et al
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Jordan Lane, Jasmine Jermaine Hall, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noble v. Warden John/Jane Doe
as 1:2024cv00633
Petitioner:
Jerome Noble
Respondent:
Warden John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. John/Jane Doe
as 1:2024cv00339
Petitioner:
Marcus Allen
Respondent:
John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Paul et al
as 1:2024cv01054
Plaintiff:
Elijah Reid
Defendant:
. Paul, Mindi Nurse, . Montenero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Britten v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv01047
Plaintiff:
Clarence Britten
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Latoya Hughes, Illinois Department of Corrections Administrative Review Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
