Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 224
Smith v. Renshaw et al
as 3:2016cv03119
Plaintiff: Anthony King Smith
Defendant: Netti Renshaw, Robert Johnson, Tony Camp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Renshaw et al
as 4:2016cv00618
Plaintiff: Anthony King Smith
Defendant: Netti Renshaw, Robert Johnson, Tony Camp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. WINGARD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv06174
Petitioner: ROBERT JOHNSON
Respondent: WINGARD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DAUPHIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Felder v. Leggett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv03469
Plaintiff: Maurice Markell Felder
Defendant: Isial Leggett, M. Jones, Timothy Bettis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Brumfield v. Barrett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv03109
Plaintiff: Marquis Brumfield
Defendant: Rebecca Barrett, Netti Renshaw, Don Harris, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brumfield v. Barrett et al
as 4:2016cv00550
Plaintiff: Marquis Brumfield
Defendant: Rebecca Barrett, Netti Renshaw, Don Harris, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FELDER v. LEGGETT et al
as 1:2016cv01865
Plaintiff: MAURICE MARKELL FELDER
Defendant: ISIAL LEGGETT, M. JONES, TIMOTHY BETTIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv06149
Plaintiff: Robert Johnson
Defendant: City of New York and New York City of Correction Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bishop et al
as 1:2016cv01584
Plaintiff: Robert Johnson
Defendant: Fred Bishop and Daniel Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Parchman Medical Departmnent et al
as 4:2016cv00057
Plaintiff: Robert Johnson
Defendant: Parchman Medical Departmnent, William Barr and Gloria Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?