Cases 131 - 140 of 1,323
Reid v. Dobbs
as 1:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Lesford Mark Reid
Defendant:
Bryan K Dobbs, Unknown Bartlett, Unknown Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jung-Peters v. Bagley et al
as 7:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Marc Arron Jung-Peters
Defendant:
Ben Bagley, Akacia Teague, Vera Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashley Heath Baker v. Larry Chandler, et al
as 23-5015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASHLEY HEATH A. BAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY D. CHANDLER, Warden, COOKIE CREWS, RHONDA D. MAY and others
Houston v. Heath et al
as 9:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Donte Houston
Defendant:
Joseph Heath and Unknown Dom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pinkston v. Fort Wayne City of et al
as 1:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Sy-Bron L Pinkston
Defendant:
Fort Wayne City of, Susan Hughes, Christopher Hawthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers v. USA
as 8:2023cv00009
Petitioner:
Heath Powers
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hicks v. City of Akron, et al
as 5:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Mr. Charles Hicks and Charles Hicks
Defendant:
City of Akron, Acting Chief Michael Caprez, Officer John Turnure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knight v. Edwards et al
as 2:2022cv05342
Plaintiff:
Raymond Knight
Defendant:
Daniel Edwards, Heath Martin, Robert Goings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Thrasher et al
as 4:2022cv01129
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Bob Thrasher, James Young, Brad Shepard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath et al v. Kegan et al
as 4:2022cv01130
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath and Red River Credit Union
Defendant:
Joe Kegan, Parole Board Houston Texas, Parole Board Austin Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
