Cases 11 - 20 of 25,827
Jones #347223 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01394
Petitioner:
LC Jones, III
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Joseph et al
as 6:2024cv01086
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Smith
Defendant:
Clophat Jean Joseph and Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roldan v. Nassau County Correction Center et al
as 9:2024cv04167
Plaintiff:
Roberto Roldan
Defendant:
Nassau County Correction Center, James E. Dzurenda, Jone Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATTS et al v. TATE et al
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
JOHN WATTS, TRAYVON J. TUMER, ELIJAH GIORDINA and others
Defendant:
ABBIE TATE, SHAUN EDMUNSON, BRENDA MATTHEWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Jones
as 4:2024cv00120
Petitioner:
Kaivon Mitchell
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Lineberry et al
as 3:2024cv00715
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. Jones
Defendant:
Amber Lineberry and Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv04559
Plaintiff:
Theryn Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MUHAMMAD v. ARMFIELD et al
as 2:2024cv02553
Petitioner:
WALID ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
JAMES ARMFIELD, AL MILES, WILBUR JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wheatley v. D'Apolito et al.
as 4:2024cv00987
Plaintiff:
Tiffany D. Wheatley
Defendant:
Hon. Anthony D'Apolito, Gina DeGenova, Katherine Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
