Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Spurlock v. USA
as 2:2016cv01136
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Spurlock
Defendant:
USA, Aaron Jones, Clint Sonnier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spurlock v. Jones et al
as 2:2016cv01031
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Spurlock
Defendant:
Aaron Jones, Clint Sonnier, D Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. USA
as 1:2016cv11327
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Aaron Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones v. Secretary, Department Of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv00532
Petitioner:
Michael John Aaron Jones
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Secretary, Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv01293
Petitioner:
Michael John Aaron Jones
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aaron Jones v. Mrs. M. Reherman, et al
as 13-10274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON MICHAEL JONES, a.k.a. Michael John Aaron Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
M. REHERMAN, Unit C Unit Manager, FCC Coleman Medium, FCC COLEMAN - MEDIUM WARDEN, FIGUROA, Mrs. FNU, FCC Coleman Medium Case Manager Coordinator and others
Aaron Jones v. Bradley Mermon, et al
as 12-2118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON MICHAEL JONES, a/k/a Michael John Aaron Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
BRADLEY MERMON, Officer Robinson Township Police, DALE VIETMEIER, Robinson Township Police, ANDREW BRUGGMAN, Trooper Pennsylvania State Police and others
Jones v. Martel
as 2:2009cv02360
Petitioner:
Aaron Jones
Respondent:
M. Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beaulieu et al v. Ludeman et al
as 0:2007cv01535
Plaintiff:
Wallace James Beaulieu, Lionel Tohannie Yazzie, Larry Delaney, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Cal R. Ludeman, Cal R. Ludeman, Joan Fabian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
