Cases 11 - 20 of 12,936
Huffman v. Huff et al
as 7:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Jullian Andrew Pres Huffman
Defendant:
Neil Huff, Jennifer Lester, Brett Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Helton
as 7:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Jullian Andrew Huffman
Defendant:
Helton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGraw v. Huffman
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Andrew McGraw
Defendant:
Brand Huffman
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Omar et al (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Ellu M. Omar, Demetrius M. Wallace, Jerren R. Pack and others
Defendant:
Diggins, Line, Bruning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alston v. Gallant Et AL
as 0:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
Londell Lashun Alston
Defendant:
Andrew W. Gallant Et AL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Hale-El (PS) v. Lockheed Martin Space et al
as 1:2024cv01665
Plaintiff:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Space, Amy Jackson and Andrew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherman, Andrew v. Radcliffe, Richard et al
as 3:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Andrew Charles Sherman
Defendant:
Honorable Judge Richard A. Radcliffe, District Attorney Kevin Croninger and Attorney Rachel Pisors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Roberts et al
as 1:2024cv01027
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Andrews, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Ricky Roberts, Gayla Telano, Dr. Deana Hopson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 9:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dammean Moss v. Andrew Dyer, et al
as 24-1514
Plaintiff:
DAMMEAN R. MOSS
Defendant:
ANDREW DYER, WENDI WALWORTH, KATHLEEN PARSONS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
