Cases 11 - 20 of 245
Larry Williams v. Warden Kelly
as 23-6416
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN KELLY, JAMES SAVGE, DOC DEEZIEN and others
JOHNSON v. HARRISON et al
as 5:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
MILTON KENT JOHNSON
Defendant:
MRS HARRISON, MR WILLIAMS, DR NWAUBEZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. HARRISON et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
MILTON KENT JOHNSON
Defendant:
MRS HARRISON, MR WILLIAMS, DR NWAUBEZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barfield v. USA
as 5:2023cv00063
Petitioner:
Zachary Jay Barfield
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Charlie Hardin v. D. Everett
as 23-6105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant / Appellee:
D. EVERETT, Superintendent, CAPTAIN TURLEY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MULLEN and others
BONILLA-BONILLA v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
MARVIN BONILLA-BONILLA
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTRAL STATE PRISON, JOHN BARFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barfield v. Joyner
as 7:2022cv00107
Petitioner:
Maurice Barfield
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DUNSON v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2022cv00319
Plaintiff:
Jerome Dunson and JEROME DUNSON, SR
Defendant:
GREGORY SAMPSON, TRACY JEFFERSON, MICHEAL THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Thomas et al
as 2:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Michael Contreras and Michael Paul Contreras
Defendant:
Brian Thomas, Brooks W Barfield, Douglas R Woodburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobs v. Davis et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Jacobs
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis and Trey Barfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
