Cases 11 - 20 of 552
M.T.B. v. Byers et al
as 2:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
M.T.B.
Respondent:
Shawn Byers and Jailer Jason Maydak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilks, Timothy v. Hannula, J. et al
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Wilks
Defendant:
Dr. J. Hannula, Dr. R. Maddikunta, RN E. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cerimovic v. Byers et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Zinaid Najo Cerimovic
Respondent:
Shawn Byers and Jailer Jason Maydak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stockton v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Wellpath LLC, Bobby Glover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Shipman et al
as 4:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Shelby Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cowgill v. Shipman et al
as 4:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jeffery S Cowgill
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Shelby Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dial v. Byers
as 6:2024cv06007
Petitioner:
Johnathan Dial
Respondent:
Jared Byers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Byers v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00173
Petitioner:
Jodie Louis Byers
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Byers v. Sheriff
as 4:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
Jason L Byers and Jason Logan Byers
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
