Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 3,859
Ridgley et al v. Bailey
as 1:2024cv01004
Plaintiff: John Ridgley and Brandon Sweetman
Defendant: Warden and William Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03121
Plaintiff: Jesse Leonard Massey
Defendant: State of Missouri, Springfield Police Department and multiple unknown officers, City of Springfield, Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Warden, FCI Texarkana
as 5:2024cv00074
Petitioner: James Robert Bailey
Respondent: Warden, FCI Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Terri McGuire-Mollica v. Richard Griffin, et al
as 24-11081
Plaintiff: TERRI MCGUIRE-MOLLICA
Defendant: RICHARD GRIFFIN, XINYU LI and SHARON BAILEY
Tideous Lee v. Gee, et al
as 24-11040
Plaintiff: TIDEOUS LEE
Defendant: GEE, SILVERBERG and BAILEY
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff: David Meyers
Defendant: Kyle Rosch, Chadwick Dotson, S. Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deon Bailey v. United States
as 24-2118
Petitioner: Deon Anthony Romell Bailey
Respondent: United States of America
Bailey (PS) v. US Probation Office et al
as 1:2024cv01535
Petitioner: Darrel Lamont Bailey and Darrell Lamont Bailey
Respondent: US Probation Office and Governor of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gormley (PS) v. Khanzada et al
as 1:2024cv01534
Plaintiff: Kathleen Gormley and Kathleen Mary Gormley
Defendant: Abdul Khanzada, Brittany Khanzada, Tony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
M.L. et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff: M.L., E.W. and S.W.
Defendant: Merrick Garland, Colette Peters, Christopher Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?