Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Botelho v. AT Wall
as 1:2014cv00516
Petitioner:
Joseph Botelho
Defendant:
AT Wall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Botelho v. Palmer et al
as 3:2012cv00460
Petitioner:
Michael Todd Botelho
Respondent:
Nevada, State Of and Jack Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tia v. Gribbin et al
as 1:2012cv00473
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Michael Gribbin, Fonoti, Salanoa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Botelho v. City of San Leandro et al
as 5:2011cv04311
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Botelho
Defendant:
City of San Leandro, San Leandro Police Department, Daniel Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Botelho v. Tracy et al
as 5:2011ct03046
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Botelho
Defendant:
John Tracy and B. Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chase v. RI Department of Corrections, et al
as 10-1175
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BOTELHO, MICHAEL A. BRENNAN, ALFRED BRISSETTE and others
Movant - Appellant:
PARRISH CHASE
Defendant - Appellee:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF RHODE ISLAND
Interested Party:
MICHAEL RICHARDSON, THOMAS WEBB, KENNETH WILSON and others
Caldwell v. Wyatt Detention Facility et al
as 1:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Moses Caldwell
Defendant:
Donald W Wyatt Detention Facility, Michael Fair, Tapley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watrous v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2009cv00599
Plaintiff:
Vaughn S. Watrous
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr., Tapley, F. Botelho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Zasha Botelho
as 09-17337
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ZASHA BOTELHO
Schmitt et al v. Botelho et al
as 1:2009cv10978
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Schmitt
Defendant:
Manuel Botelho, Natalya Pushkina, Petrou and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
