Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Banks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2017ct03076
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FMC Butner, Logan Graddy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Banks v. Eddy, et al
as 17-1197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
CYNTHIA REED EDDY, MARK HORNAK, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY and others
Banks v. Langford et al
as 5:2017ct03057
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Felicia Langford, Jeff Sessions, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Derrick Smith v. Ian Wallace, et al
as 16-4438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Derrick Ray Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Ian Wallace, Warden, Mina K. Massey, Prison Doctor, Nina Hill and others
Defendant:
Bill Stange, Assistant Warden, Jane Bucannon, Captain, R. Trout, C.C.A. and others
Banks v. Ross et al
as 5:2016ct03185
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Heather Ross, Officer Miller, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. McCorkle et al
as 5:2016hc02139
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
C/O McCorkle, Thomas Smith, Mark Hornack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Eddy et al
as 1:2016cv10974
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Cynthia Reed Eddy, Mark Hornak, Timothy Pivnichny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Werner et al
as 1:2016cv10964
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Robert Werner, Federal Bureau Investigations, John Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Trump et al
as 1:2016cv03253
Plaintiff:
Frederick H. Banks
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Mark Hornak, Sean Langford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2015cv01498
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, ROBERT CESSOR, DAVID HICTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
