Cases 11 - 20 of 2,637
(HC) Sanchez v. Cates
as 1:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Alejandro Sanchez
Defendant:
B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hartley v. Cate et al
as 3:2023cv01337
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Hartley
Defendant:
Nathan Cate, Criminal Clerk's Office, Metro Impound Lot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Sanchez v. Warden et al
as 1:2023cv01706
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Sanchez
Defendant:
Warden, B. Cates, Officer Murro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Amesquita v. Macomber et al
as 1:2023cv01604
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Amesquita
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Brian Cates, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Warden Smith et al
as 4:2023cv01097
Plaintiff:
Carlese Hall
Defendant:
Warden Smith, APRN Smith, HSA Chano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CATES v. USA
as 1:2023cv00876
Petitioner:
MAURICE VINSHAWN CATES, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Cates v. Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
as 1:2023cv00896
Petitioner:
Norman Cates
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noe Moreno v. Brian Cates
as 2:2023cv08676
Petitioner:
Noe Moreno
Respondent:
Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dill et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Teresa Denise Dill, Tarrah Layne Woods, Shannon Michelle Longman and others
Defendant:
FNU Thomas, FNU Hansen, FNU Shumack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jimenez v. Cates
as 1:2023cv01376
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel Jimenez
Defendant:
B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
