Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Mrazek v. Clarke
as 3:2020cv03109
Petitioner: Craig Mrazek
Respondent: Daniel Clarke
Not Classified By Court: Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Belser v. Evans et al
as 2:2020cv10394
Defendant: Danielle Clark Hagaman and Vonda R. Evans
Plaintiff: Marvin Belser, Sr.
Clark v. Schnell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2020cv00248
Respondent: Paul Schnell and Shannon Reimann
Petitioner: Nathan Daniel Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kodatt v. Pritzker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv03252
Defendant: . Waynescott, . Pierce, J B Pritzker and others
Plaintiff: Steven Kodatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armour v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2019cv03240
Plaintiff: Charles W Armour
Defendant: Tracy Cheatham, Daniel Sullivan, John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Clark We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01313
Respondent: Daniel Clark
Petitioner: Johnnie Lee Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Armour v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2019cv06042
Plaintiff: Charles W Armour
Defendant: Daniel Sullivan, Illinois Department of Corrections (I.D.O.C.), John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubert Babb v. Clara Smith, et al
as 17-15173
Plaintiff - Appellant: HUBERT BABB
Defendant - Appellee: CLARA SMITH, Assistant State Attorney, DANIEL CLARK, Assistant State Attorney, BRIAN LANG, Attorney and others
Clark v. Brown et al
as 5:2017cv00798
Plaintiff: Jesse Daniel Clark, II
Defendant: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Director Department of Corrections and Warden at San Quentin State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BABB v. SMITH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00620
Plaintiff: HUBERT BABB
Defendant: CLARA SMITH, DANIEL CLARK, BRIAN LANG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?