Cases 11 - 20 of 26
OConnor v. Helder et al
as 5:2021cv05083
Plaintiff:
Casey OConnor, Casey O, OConnor and others
Defendant:
Former Sheriff Charles Edge, Jail Administrator Kelly Cantrel, Sheriff Brad Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brint Clark v. Lt. M. Martinez et al
as 5:2021cv00340
Defendant:
Sgt. R. Marshall, Sheriff Deputy James, Sheriff Deputy Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Brint Earl Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Lerma v. M. Martinez et al
as 5:2021cv00253
Defendant:
Sheriff Deputy A. Prince, L. Flores, Padilla and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lerma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEGRIN v. GARY et al
as 5:2020cv00428
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT JOHN GARY, SHERIFF R DARREN MITCHUM, CHIEF DEPUTY JAMES A FAULK and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC MATTHEW NEGRIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'Alessandro v. Anthony et al
as 9:2020cv81950
Defendant:
Marcos, Sergeant Vanhouten, Deputy Munden and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Louis D'Alessandro, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEGRIN v. MITCHUM et al
as 5:2020cv00399
Defendant:
SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, JUDGE DAVID BROWN, SHERIFF DARREN MITCHUM and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC M NEGRIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Ross et al
as 4:2020cv04081
Defendant:
Carl Jensen, Tim Garner, Gina Butler and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Lester Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smalls v. Charleston County et al
as 2:2020cv02743
Plaintiff:
Rodney Smalls
Defendant:
Deputy James Carter, III, Charleston County and Charleston County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Nordstrom v. Nuttall et al
as 6:2020cv00132
Defendant:
Kyle Nuttall, Deputy James Sherer and Trooper FNU Tice
Plaintiff:
Paul Nordstrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAY v. Bivins et al
as 6:2018cv00133
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CLAY
Defendant:
Lt. Robyn Banks and Deputy James Ron Bivins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
