Cases 11 - 20 of 1,110
Brandt v. Cimarron Correctional Facility and Staff, et al
as 24-6089
Plaintiff:
DONNA R. BRANDT
Defendant:
CIMARRON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND STAFF, TERRACE DICKERSON, Former Warden, FNU GRANTE, Assistance Warden and others
Michael Criddle v. Jackson County Sheriff Office, et al
as 24-1476
Plaintiff:
Michael Christopher Criddle
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriff Office, Ruth Ann Dickerson, David James and others
Travis Dickerson v. Milwaukee County, et al
as 24-1622
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DICKERSON
Defendant:
MILWAUKEE COUNTY, C.O. JONES and JOHN DOE, or JANE DOE, Kitchen Supervisor
Travis Dickerson v. Milwaukee County, et al
as 24-1621
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DICKERSON
Defendant:
MILWAUKEE COUNTY, C.O. JONES and JOHN DOE, or JANE DOE, Kitchen Supervisor
Titus v. Omega Center
as 6:2024cv06056
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Double Tree Parking Garage et al
as 4:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eugene King v. Orangeburg County Court of Common Pleas
as 24-6153
Plaintiff:
EUGENE KING
Defendant:
ORANGEBURG COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and EDWARD DICKERSON, Administrative Judge, Individual and official capacity
Titus v Scarface et al
as 4:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Scarface, Al Pacino, Keef Coff Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Titus v. Scarface, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus, ADC #168523
Defendant:
Scarface, Movie, Al Pacino, Director of Scarface, Keef Coff Group and others
(PC) Dickerson v. Rueter, et al.,
as 2:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Dickerson
Defendant:
Kevin Rueter, High Desert State Prison and Health Care Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
