Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv00035
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-6524
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Martinez-Lerma v. Hall et al
as 4:2010cv00095
Respondent:
Director of B.O.P., Warden Keith Hall, U.S. Attorney General and others
Petitioner:
Rene Martinez-Lerma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Martinez-Lerma v. Hall et al
as 4:2010cv00084
Respondent:
Director of B.O.P., Warden Keith Hall, U.S. Attorney General and others
Petitioner:
Rene Martinez-Lerma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Arnold Reeves v. Harley Lapin, et al
as 10-1100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARNOLD REEVES
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPIN, Director of B.O.P., D. SCOTT DODRILL, Northeast Regional Director, J. GRONDOLSKY, Warden and others
Martinez-Lerma v. Hall et al
as 6:2009cv00035
Petitioner:
Rene Martinez-Lerma
Respondent:
Keith Hall, Director of B.O.P., U.S. Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Newberry v. O'Brien et al
as 8:2008cv00320
Petitioner:
John Newberry
Respondent:
Terry O'Brien and Director of B.O.P
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Richie v. Director of B.O.P. et al
as 1:2007cv07071
Plaintiff:
Daryl Richie
Defendant:
Director of B.O.P., Eric Wilson, John Pindowsky and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Williams v. Halbert et al
as 5:2008cv00006
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Williams
Defendant:
Tara Halbert, James Buckner, Ms. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoff v. Lappin
as 07-1519
Petitioner - Appellant:
GORDON O. HOFF, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director of B.O.P.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
