Cases 11 - 20 of 21
RICHARDSON v. PRES. B. OBAMA et al
as 3:2013cv00279
Petitioner:
ERIC RICHARDSON
Respondent:
PRES. B. OBAMA, E. HOLDER and M. KIRBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eric Richardson v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 13-4093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, SGT. APODACA, ROBERT REED, Hearing Examiner and others
US v. Eric Richardson
as 13-6687
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ERIC RICHARDSON, a/k/a Father
RICHARDSON v. BURNS et al
as 1:2013cv00110
Petitioner:
ERIC RICHARDSON
Respondent:
DANIEL P. BURNS, APODACA, ROBERT REED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RICHARDSON v. WARNER et al
as 2:2012cv04956
Plaintiff:
ERIC RICHARDSON
Defendant:
WARNER, TOOMER, JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Dave Yelverton
as 2:2011cv00394
Plaintiff:
Eric Richardson
Defendant:
Dave Yelverton
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richardson v. Jackson Parish Correctional Center
as 3:2010cv01901
Plaintiff:
Eric Richardson
Defendant:
Warden Jackson Parish Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RICHARDSON v. SCI GRATERFORD STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 2:2010cv00033
Plaintiff:
ERIC RICHARDSON
Defendant:
SCI GRATERFORD STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, MICHAEL A. LORENZO, TY BARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Furlow
as 6:2009cv02036
Plaintiff:
Dustin Eric Richardson
Defendant:
John Furlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 4:2009cv04767
Plaintiff:
Eric Richardson
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, The People of the State of California and James E. Tilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
