Cases 11 - 20 of 30
JONES v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2011cv00701
Plaintiff:
FRANK JONES
Defendant:
BRIAN COLEMAN, JILL MONAS, JASON ASHTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
as 2:2011cv02982
Petitioner:
FRANK JONES
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Frank Jones v. Brian Coleman, et al
as 11-1883
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN COLEMAN, Superintendent, SCI-Fayette and COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
JONES v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2010cv07429
Petitioner:
FRANK JONES
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN and COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JONES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2010cv02021
Petitioner:
FRANK JONES
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frank Jones v. Calipatria State Prison
as 2:2010cv02174
Respondent:
Calipatria State Prison
Petitioner:
Frank Jones
Jones v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2010cv00022
Petitioner:
William Frank Jones, Jr
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2009cv02301
Petitioner:
William Frank Jones, Jr
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00577
Plaintiff:
Frank Jones
Defendant:
Warden Thomas, Sgt. Clements and C. O. I. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Corbitt et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00367
Plaintiff:
Frank Jones
Defendant:
Dr. Corbitt, Dr. McAuther and CMS Health Care Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
