Cases 11 - 20 of 59
McMaster v. LaBarge et al
as 9:2015cv00578
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McMaster
Defendant:
L. W. LaBarge, S. D. Lamare, E. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry Duncan, II v. Harold Clarke
as 15-6079
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY RAY DUNCAN, II
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of VA DOC, sued individually and in official capacity, G. M. HINKLE, Warden, Greensville Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity and M. R. HANDSOME, Lieutenant, Greensville Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity
Randall Keystone v. P. Scarberry
as 14-6325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL J. KEYSTONE
Defendant - Appellee:
P. SCARBERRY, Food Services Director, R.C. MATHENA, Warden, G. M. HINKLE, Regional Administrator, VA-DOC and others
Jones v. Hadnot
as 9:2013cv00185
Plaintiff:
Clifford Jones
Defendant:
G M Hadnot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis Brailey v. G. Hinkle
as 13-6561
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIS ALFRED BRAILEY
Respondent - Appellee:
G. M. HINKLE, Chief Warden, Greensville Correctional Center
Joseph Daniels v. G. Hinkle
as 12-7218
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH A. DANIELS
Respondent - Appellee:
G. M. HINKLE, Warden
Duncan v. Clark et al
as 3:2012cv00482
Plaintiff:
Henry Ray Duncan, II
Defendant:
Harold Clark, G. M. Hinkle and M. R. Handson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dutton v. Reynolds et al
as 3:2012cv00427
Plaintiff:
Frederick Charles Dutton, Jr.
Defendant:
J. J. Reynolds, M. Musser, J. T. Merritt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brailey v. Hinkle
as 3:2012cv00167
Petitioner:
Willis Alfred Brailey
Respondent:
G. M. Hinkle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Buckley v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2012cv01018
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cortez Buckley
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, L. Locke, James Tilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
