Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Goodwin v. In and Out Bail Bonds et al
as 6:2020cv02143
Plaintiff:
Willie Goodwin
Defendant:
Palmetto Surety Corporation, United States of America Probation Office, In and Out Bail Bonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. Mackelburg
as 0:2019cv01816
Respondent:
Warden Mackelburg
Petitioner:
Eddie Kodell Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Goodwin v. Joyner
as 1:2019cv00690
Petitioner:
Leonard B. Goodwin
Defendant:
Mr. Aaron Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ridley v. Budz et al
as 1:2018cv02716
Plaintiff:
Richard Ridley
Defendant:
Mark Davis, Timothy Budz, Dr. Christopher Kunkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Wright v. Budz et al
as 5:2018cv02720
Defendant:
Captain Ugiano, Chandra Goodwin, Christopher Kunkle and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. Beatty et al
as 8:2018cv02062
Petitioner:
Desmonta Antwin Maurice Goodwin
Respondent:
Scarlett A Wilson and Chief Beatty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Haynesworth v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions et al
as 2:2017cv03247
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Haynesworth
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions , South Carolina Department of Mental Health, C Kunkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. Lexington County, South Carolina et al
as 3:2017cv01426
Plaintiff:
Twanda Marshinda Brown , Sasha Monique Darby , Cayeshia Cashel Johnson and others
Defendant:
Lexington County, South Carolina, Gary Reinhart, Rebecca Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galloway v. Wood et al
as 8:2016cv02497
Plaintiff:
Steven Galloway
Defendant:
Beverly A Wood, Donikia S Gray, Shelly L Atkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyke v. Mackie et al
as 6:2016cv00279
Plaintiff:
Roger Allen Dyke
Defendant:
Bernard Mackie, Michael McCall, Larry Cartledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
