Cases 11 - 20 of 496
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Erakat v. Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Erakat
Defendant:
Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service, Ogden, Utaha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00052
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Ageyev v. United States Internal Revenue Service
as 4:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Mikhail Y Ageyev
Defendant:
United States Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
(PC) Fierro v. Department of the Treasury et al
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Luis Angel Fierro
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De La Miya v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Kerry Salas De La Miya
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farris v. Internal Revenue Service
as 4:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Shawn Wayne Farris
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Perkins v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv00984
Plaintiff:
Victor B. Perkins
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Donald J. Trump and Director of the Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
